| Volume XXVI |
January
2006
|
Number
6
|
|
Recent Developments
With the recent developments in the administration of the Florida School of Preaching, we are confident that the school will continue on the path we have traveled since the school began. We regret to lose brother Davis, but having him continue as a member of the faculty will mean that we will still be able to draw from his wisdom as decision are made for the school.
Since the 2006 Lectureship for the Florida School of Preaching is in January, and the lectures are centered on restoration, I thought additional reflections on the idea of restoration at this time might be profitable. From the Merriam Webster’s College Dictionary, we have the following as the commonly understood meaning of the term restore:
Observations When we propose to give back or return something, we must decide what it is we wish to return. If restore means to “3. bring back to or put into a former or original state; renew,” we must have something that is possible to be recognized as a former original state. To put again in possession of something, we must know what would be entailed in such an effort. If not, all talk about restoring is nonsense. Examples The Handbook of Denominations in the United States, by Frank S. Mead (10th edition, revised by Samuel S. Hill), is “widely recognized as the most accurate, objective, and comprehensive source of information about America’s religious denominations” (Taken from the cover). Using this source, we wish to cite the date of origin of some Denominations in our country. A random listing shows the following:
Contrast In contrast to the above Denominational dates of origin, the church of Christ had its origin in Jerusalem on the first Pentecost following the resurrection of Jesus Christ (Acts 2). It began under the divine supervision of the Holy Spirit and did not need a convention of men and women to originate its doctrines and faith. The Holy Spirit was sent by God (John 14:26) and Christ (John 16:13-15) to guide the founders into all truth. The finished product of their work is the New Testament, referred to as the Apostles’ Doctrine (Acts 2:42) and the doctrine of Christ (2 John 9-11). Anyone claiming to be spiritual or guided in their doctrines that differ from what the Apostles presented are to be rejected (1 Cor. 14:37-38; Gal. 1:6-12; 2 Cor. 10:12, 18, 4-5). Suppose I were to have as my goal the reproduction of one of the denominations cited above. What would I need to do? What period of time and source of information would I need to have in order to accomplish my goal? Could I take the doctrines of one denomination and establish a different denomination? Could I take Baptist doctrine and establish a Luthran Church? Because I may agree with Campbell or Stone, Luther or Calvin, or a Pope in Rome on an item, it does not make them my Lord nor do they become my standard of religious authority. Are all religious groups the same? Would some say that one religious group is better than another? If yes, on what basis would the evaluation be made? If religious values are totally subjective, none could claim superiority over another. There are truths taught by most religious groups, but if a given group teaches truth, that truth must be verified by an objective and authoritative source. The only objective and authoritative source of religious truth is the Bible, properly translated and interpreted. Were Stone and Campbell desiring to start a religious movement named after themselves? If yes, where may we read of this and have the documentation sufficient to restore it (a Stone-Campbell church)? If no such documentation is available, is a person honest if that person claims to restore that which never had an existence? Let me illustrate, if I claimed to have located and restored a $3.50 dollar bill, how much credibility would I have? Such never existed, thus never could it be restored. If restoration is not possible, where are we authorized to start any religion? Merely using the name of a person, no matter how much respect that individual may have, is no value in restoration. Do you think for a moment my claim that I have located and restored a $3.50 dollar bill would be given credibility if I called it a “Stone-Campbell $3.50 dollar bill”? Yes, there are those who would call themselves a part of a movement–the Stone-Campbell Movement. When they so identify themselves, they reveal to all their weakness. If Stone and Campbell did not claim any authority for themselves, why should we cite them as our basis for religious ideas and customs? To paraphrase the Apostle Paul: Was Stone or Campbell crucified for you? Were you baptized into the name of Stone or Campbell? I thank God that I was not baptized by Stone or Campbell lest some think that I am a part of a Stone-Campbell Movement. We hope you will avail yourselves of the studies we have made on the subject of restoration in our 2006 Lectureship Book. The Lectures are available in hardback or on CD. You may also obtain the lectures live when they are presented (www.fsop.net), and they are available on individual CDs and in MP3 format (all speakers on a single CD) for your car or home CD players. NOTE: MP3 CDs must have an MP3 player. Gene Burgett Report
I want to thank the many congregations that allowed me to visit with them during the year 2005 and tell them about the work of the Florida School of Preaching. Not every congregation with which I spoke has been able to support us financially in the work of training preachers. However, I am thankful that all received me with kindness. I recently returned from a trip to Alabama where I worshiped with the Lord’s church in Double Springs. I was elated to learn from the elders that they had made room for the Florida School of Preaching in their 2006 budget. My parents live in the Double Springs area, which has given me many opportunities to worship with the church at that location. I have grown quite fond of the Double Springs brethren and look forward to holding a meeting there October 29 - November 1 of this year. As always, I am available to speak to any congregations or individuals that would like to know more about the Florida School of Preaching. I am always searching for men who would like to preach the gospel as well as those who would like to support a good work. Have a great new year!
|
Maurice Davis has asked to be relieved of his service on the Board of Directors effective, December 31, 2005. He has served on the Board since 1988. He will continue to teach classes for the school. 
Brother Denny Smitherman has been appointed by the Board to serve as Vice President to the Board of Directors. He is an elder for the Wesconnett church of Christ in Jacksonville, Florida. 
Gene Burgett, Director of Public Relations, has been added to the Board of Directors. Gene, as many of you know, is a 1985 graduate of the Florida School of Preaching. Gene has taught classes for a number of years both in the extension classes and the classes meeting daily at South Florida Avenue. Gene received his A.A. from Palm Beach Junior College, a B. A. from American Christian Bible college in 1998 and an M.A. from American Christian School of Religion in 2000. Gene was the preacher for the High Springs congregation for fourteen (14) years where he also conducted a weekly radio program and published a bi-monthly periodical. He continues to teach classes at the Florida School of Preaching.
Brian Kenyon, Associate Director, has been appointed by the Board to be the associate Secretary to the Board of Directors. He will be assisting brother J. H. Blackman, Jr. who is the present secretary. Brian is a graduate of the Florida School of Preaching, 1991, and has an A.S. degree from the Florida Institute of Technology, 1984. He has three degrees from Freed-Hardeman University. In 1993, he received an M.A. in New Testament. In addition to his teaching duties, his work as Associate Director, Brian also edits the annual lectureship book.
Frank W. (Bill) Norton has been added to the Board of Directors. Bill serves as one of the elders of the Orange Street church of Christ, Auburndale, Florida. 
